feedback from last week:
- angles and proportions need to be justified and measured properly
- think more specifically about the choice of material
optimal viewing distance: 5 metres
proposal 1 is true to size and accurately depicts the distorted perspective. we found the proportions to be too jarring, so we tried to minimise the angle in the next proposal.
optimal viewing distance: 15 metres
for both proposals, the metal structures are positioned and angled in such a way that when seen from the optimal position, they align with the edges of the canopy and the two poles behind are hidden by the front two.
different variations of indicators for optimal viewing position. echoes the shape of the structure