Skip to toolbar

CategoryFinal Project

Bubble-Down!

Fabian Kang and Zhou Yang, Bubble-Down!, 2018, laser-cut medium density fibreboard, sound-sensors, LED lights, powered by Arduino.

 

Concept

The idea is for players to use a sheet of bubble wrap to play the game as it was this touch and feel that we wanted to be integral to the interaction. Bubble wrap also becomes this expendable medium that has to be ‘refilled’ after each game.

Bubble wrap works like a physical button, having the haptic feedback of the contained air being squeezed and emission of a pop sound when it then bursts.

Bubble wrap is usually something that people press without much thought to it. And indeed it can be somewhat addictively mindless. Hence, we were wondering what if each press of the bubbles has to be considered very very carefully? With Bubble-Down! (2018), we invite players to battle it out in a minesweeper-meets-battleships game of suspense, interacting with bubble wrap in an unconventional way.

 

Gameplay

  1. Players will plant their bombs without the knowledge of their opponents. They should take note of those positions they have rigged up.
  2. Players will swap places.
  3. The game commences with players having 5 ‘lives’ each.
  4. Players will take turns to pop the bubble wraps. It is mandatory to pop once upon each turn. Should a light go on, the player loses a ‘life’.
  5. The game continues till either player has exhausted his or her 5 ‘lives’.

 

Documentation

Fabian Kang and Zhou Yang, Bubble-Down! Documentation, 2018.

Above is a short video to showcase the process underwent by our team from ideation to execution.

 

Design 

The main challenges faced was understanding how a sound sensor works and what inputs is Arduino recognizing.  We realized that although we tried getting an analogue input, Arduino was picking the bubble wrap ‘pop’ sound consistently as a value of 1023 (analogue inputs having only a maximum of 1024 values). This meant that the analogue inputs were no different from a binary digital input. It was either recognizing the reading as a sound or as silence.

Hence, much of the design was highly focused on the contact areas of the bubble wrap and the medium-density fiberboard (MDF). We had to ensure a layer of separation between the cubes that had ‘bombs’ in them or those that were without. MDF was the chosen material as it was able to allow the sounds to travel to the sound sensor. We realized that the sensor had to be directly in contact with the board surface, hence we improvised a solution involving clothspegs that will secure them as desired.

 

These are some process of the Design:

 

The design solution was to separate Part A from Part B which in turn had to all be separated from the table surface as well. This was done by the small pieces of Parts C that would be stacked to create stilts for the bases of the aforementioned parts. We also calculated the exact length of the ‘bombs’ so that that stick would cause contact from Part A to Part B.

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Without 'bomb'                      With 'bomb'

 

The key takeaway from this Final Project is that working with something like a sound sensor that is very depended on the environment and the interactive situation, one certainly needs to be wary of the efforts to adjust to the calibration requirements of the hardware. We did realise the immense difficulty at some point, but decided to push ahead simply because we liked the whole process loop of things. From haptic touch with the bubble wrap, popping sounds produced by it, being picked up by the sound sensors.  It felt right to endeavor towards this and stay true to the concept we had agreed upon.

 

 

Programming

This was the basic circuitry we were working with:

And we of course rigged it up to include 10 sound sensors and 10 lights, as well as to ensure the inputs from the sound sensors are individually directed to the outputs of the corresponding lights.

After we did that, we realized that it would be cumbersome to have the players move the actual sound sensors around the board, hence the design had to allow for the sensors to be static, which was when we incorporated the idea of the ‘bombs’ to be moved around instead of the sensors.

 

Extras

Lastly, it is always certainly about the process, like in these last timelapse videos we would like to share:

With that, I think we shall look forward to a fruitful second half of FYP year!

 

POP Noise

Concept
  • Bubble wrap is like the simplest of buttons with haptic feedback.
  • The popping of the bubbles is irreversible.
  • Could we extend the act of POPping the bubbles – like how the record disk is left with a permanent imprint caused by the sounds recorded on them.

Artistic realm  Design realm
  • We are interested in the production of sound and the haptic feedback of bubble wrap.
  • We want to create a work that will be performative in nature.
Similar works, critique and differences / Inspiration sources

Image result for Bradley Hart bubble wrap gifImage result for Bradley Hart painting bubble wrap

Bradley Hart’s ‘pointillist’ bubble wrap injections to create realistic painting method.

Michael Iveson at The Averard Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Iveson builds bubble-wrap corridor inside The Averard Hotel in London. The effect of natural light coming through the varying surfaces of the POPed and unPOPed bubble wrap.

These works focused on the irreversible nature of human touch on the bubble wraps to produce a lasting visual imprint (in the case of Bradley Hart’s painting) and a spacial atmosphere (in the case of Michael Iveson’s site specific installation).

We believe that this same irreversible quality can take on a twist and help us to create a visual record of sounds produced.

Interaction (describe how people will interact with it, cover many scenarios):
Part 1
  • Participants will receive the device and some simple instructions.
  • They can choose to POP their bubble wraps in any way they wish:
  • Systematic /  Random /  One-by-One /  Area of Effect /  Till Completion /  Give up Halfways?
  • Participants will focus on the touch of the material.

Part 2

  • Participants will listen to the sounds they created.
  • They will get the copy of their music in material and recorded form.

Implementation

Handheld Interactive Device(s).

Technologies
  • Recording device.
  • MAX MSP

or

  • Arduino + Processing.
Milestones with a weekly breakdown of tasks to accomplish.
Monday, 24th September
·         Pitch Proposal
Monday, 3rd October
  • Idea Refinement
Monday, 10th October
  •  Sketching or Modelling of the Protoypes
Monday, 15th October  Low Fidelity Prototype

  • A cardboard version of the device
  • Simple MAX MSP sketch
  • User Testing and Feedback
Monday, 24 October
  • Prototype Refinement
Monday, 5th November  Refined Prototype

  • Actual Materials
  • MAX MSP working system
  • User Testing and Feedback
Monday, 7 November
  • Device Construction
  • MAX MSP debugging
Monday , 12 November Project Refinement

  • Final User Testing
  • Initial Documentations
Week of Nov 19th. Final Submission
Description of the first prototype.
  • A cardboard version of the device
  • Simple MAX MSP sketch
  • User Testing and Feedback
How will you work be shown at the end of the semester?

We will provide our participants with the devices and give them simple instructions to use them.

The participants will then possibly receive the bubble wrap they POPped.

How will you document your work? mainly the interaction?

We will document through the physical material and video recordings.