Reflection

When we were first assigned our teams, I didn’t know how everyone’s work style would be like or how we would work well with one another. However, over the semester, I had a lot of fun working with my teammates (:

We had a little trouble deciding on what topic to choose and even when we chose our topic, we had to decide on what to focus on. Each of us had different ideas and different perspectives on the topic, but ultimately we decided to take the topic out of the box and extend on the topic much further, therefore, instead on using maps as a focus on Mapping Asia, we looked at trade routes instead.

Each of us looked at the Western powers, those that travelled to Asia and colonised countless numbers of countries. We researched, individually, on which colonial power was ideal for our group. Eventually, we settled on Britain as we thought that it was interesting how they became so influential in Asia despite being the last of the colonial powers to enter Asia. Then came finding our objects! We each took a country, Singapore, Burma, India, and Hong Kong, and did research on art pieces from the individual countries. Personally, I had a lot of trouble finding colonial pieces from Hong Kong. I didn’t want to pick something that was already shown in class as I felt I should look for something that would give a fresh perspective on colonial Hong Kong and also because I thought I would be able to learn something more from a new piece.

Once we decided on our pieces, we also had to link them together. Besides being art works that came out of British Asia, what else did they show, and how were we going to display them. All of us had different ideas on the exhibit and the overall theme, and after discussing it over and over again, throwing new ideas on the table every time, we finally settled on our final piece.

The presentation was fun and also nerve-wrecking, having to keep to the time limit was hard but it was also good preparation for FYP. Our consultation actually helped us the most in finalising the details in our model exhibit. While we initially only wanted to have the country platforms, we didn’t think about the surroundings. After the consultation, we finalised our design and began working on the physical piece.

After we were done making our piece, and after the final presentation, we were given excellent feedback and even realised that there were other ways they we could have improved on our exhibit layout, like cutting out the bottom of the cellfoam to make the platform light up to give the impression that the platforms were lit up.

In conclusion, I truly enjoyed this course as well as working with my teammates. This course has really opened my eyes to the reality of the colonial empires in Asia. It was the immense research on the two presentations in the course that really exciting. It was so difficult to find certain things but the knowledge I earned in the process was incredibly rewarding.

_x7Kud-XVcz7BBfRBssGKy7RQqEkFYBl_XOjSv5JmC8 q0RGnIML0E4CPxxFbunHXoiAG0ShzTKUSFPrmEe-GMA2v4DbpSrEpDrt_EuHDtPD-_97NuxBej1i5rHBCtGjUA  f_Af2G1mCs8_WJSjomsK19rqhys1IUrM5FGv1wFzXDQ Sae3X-KPQVvfubIeEcsDeDW_HyqI6C87Izd5pzfHT4o ZwPm5mZLDj_0l37FqaLW6soSUMZVGJ0N8JIk18Yaxzc

Object Label Final

cwHK_1846_AH643890_Gden

View of Spring Gardens
Murdoch Bruce and A. Maclure
Lithography and Paint
20th August 1846
Hong Kong Museum of Art

This image is one of a series of prints by Murdoch Bruce and A. Maclure. It depicts Hong Kong as stylised towards British taste. The architectural style is influenced by and heavily resembles European architecture, including Greek columns, and is absent of any Chinese forms of architecture, such as roof ornaments taking the form of dragons or lions.

The society in British Hong Kong was racially segregated into two main groups, the local Chinese, and the foreigners, mainly the British but also included other Europeans. The land was separated, allowing the British to enjoy ‘elite’ Victorian style luxuries in the Eastern portion of Hong Kong, while racial laws were erected, forcing the natives to live in crowded living spaces in the Western portion of the island. This racial segregation materialised through mutual animosity between the two races. This animosity is disguised in the image whereby the artists portray the British as superior to the Chinese by having a local Chinese man bow to a group of foreigners, which are likely to be British — in Chinese culture, bowing is a way to show respect to one’s superiors.

While the image, at first glance, portrays a grandeur Colonial Hong Kong, it also highlights the immense difference in the socio-economic status between the two races. The British are seen as the elites of the nation, dressing in splendour, while the local Chinese are dress in simple, traditional clothes and are depicted as the working class, serving the British.

Object Label Draft 3

cwHK_1846_AH643890_Gden

View of Spring Gardens

Murdoch Bruce and A. Maclure

Lithography and Paint

20th August 1846

Hong Kong Museum of Art

This image is one of a series of prints by Murdoch Bruce and A. Maclure. It depicts Hong Kong as stylised towards British taste. The architectural style is influenced and heavily resembles European architecture, including Greek columns, and is absent of any Chinese forms of architecture, such as roof ornaments taking the form of dragons or lions.

The society in British Hong Kong was racially segregated into two main groups, the local Chinese, and the foreigners, mainly the British but also included other Europeans. The land was separated, allowing the British to enjoy ‘elite’ Victorian style luxuries in the Eastern portion of Hong Kong, while racial laws were erected, forcing the natives to live in crowded living spaces in the Western portion of the island. This racial segregation materialised through mutual animosity between the two races. This animosity is disguised in the image whereby the artists portray the British as superior to the Chinese by having a local Chinese man bow to a group of foreigners, which are likely to be British — in Chinese culture, bowing is a way to show respect to one’s superiors.

While the image, at first glance, portrays a grandeur Colonial Hong Kong, it also highlights the immense difference in the socio-economic status between the two races. The British are seen as the elites of the nation, dressing in splendour, while the local Chinese are dress in simple, traditional clothes and are depicted as serving the British.

Wall Text (Updated)

The British Empire was often described as “the empire on which the Sun never sets” when it was at its peak. This was due to the extensiveness of the empire, which stretched across the globe in the form of dominions, colonies, protectorates, and various other territories under British rule.

At the beginning of the British expansion into Asia, the British were faced with immense odds, having arrived in Asia much later than the other European powers such as the Portuguese and the Dutch. However, the British were determined in expanding their trade routes as well as their territories. The British first arrived in India, facing heavy competition from the Dutch East Indian Company, which as well established in India at the time. However, by 1757, the British East Indian Company had dominions in India surrendered to them. Just as these policies were designed to sustain British commercial ties to India, too, were British interests in China largely a result of attempts to maintain the economic well being of the centrepiece of the British Empire in India. Trade with China was desirable for British commerce, and it was also a significant means of supporting colonialism in India.

The British continued their expansion further east, occupying Burma, Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The colonisation of these territories was not without a cost. Burma came under British rule after the first Anglo-Burmese War, and Hong Kong was ceded to the British after the Chinese faced several defeats. With the 1842 Treaty of Nanking, Britain gained rights to the deep-water port of Hong Kong as a base for these economic activities.

In this exhibit, we will be looking at the art and architectural pieces that have emerged from the British colonies in Asia during the 19th Century. We will be looking at pieces from India, Burma, Singapore, and Hong Kong, and investigate how each piece reflects the colonial rule, social economic situations and influences at the time.

How did the British establish themselves amongst the locals? Were they their equals or their rulers? Journey with us along the British Asian trade route and discover socio-economic truth behind the British Empire in Asia.

—–

References:

Webster, A. (2000). Business and Empire: A reassessment of the British Conquest of Burma in 1885. The Historical Journal, 43(04), 1003-1025.

Karsh, J. A. (1834). The Root of the Opium War: Mismanagement in the Aftermath of the British East India Company’s Loss of its Monopoly in 1834 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).