HOD | art nouveau

For my Art Nouveau design, I decided to come up with an abstract design that is relevant to Singapore and my childhood.

I used ixora flower, which is found in Singapore. It’s often used as a garnish to add colour, but I think Singaporeans know it as the flower to suck nectar! It contains sweet and edible nectar, you can just pull a bunch of them out by the stem and suck on the base of it. I remember when I was a kid, my parents told me about the  I always searched for it outdoors so that I can suck the nectar!

Here’s an image of the flower I referenced from!

Image taken from https://toptropicals.com/pics/garden/05/11/1533.jpg

I also wanted to add other elements of my Singapore childhood into my abstract design and thought of the mimosa. Mimosa leaves are commonly found at grass patches in Singapore, and when I was in primary school, I realised that mimosas close up when something comes too near! Since then, I always like to find mimosas and purposely go close to them.

Here’s the image I referenced from

Image result for mimosa leave
Image taken from http://www.namethatplant.net/Images/ImagesFire/jkm12/jkm120623_152.jpg

I incorporated both the mimosa and ixora into my abstract design, to show that this is my unique Singapore art nouveau! Here’s the final design!

Till then,

HOD | hyperessay – utsuroi iroha by kanazawa mayuko


For my hyperessay, I chose Kanazawa Mayuko, a Japanese artist whom works were recently exhibited at Singapore Arts Museum’s (SAM) Imaginarium 2018 – Into the space of time. I selected her artwork which was recently exhibited at SAM, Utsuroi Iroha. Utsuroi Iroha is an artwork of seasons and time which invites their audience to participate and be a part of the artwork. Her work is relevant to our previous studies of multimedia concepts and paradigms, but I will be focusing on the topic – Interactivity in my Hyperessay.


Utsuroi Iroha is interactive in the manner that the audience stands at a marked spot and does a certain action. From that action, the visual display changes, alongside incorporating the audience itself inside the display. Image recognition sensors weaves the audience into the artwork. Below is a video that I took of my friend when we went to visit the exhibit.


Based on Norbert Wiener’s, “Cybernetics in History”, Utsuroi Iroha ties in with the concepts and forms mentioned about interactivity. In cybernetics, specifics acts of communication and transfer of information between the observer and the machine are being looked at. The principles of cybernetics are applied in Utsuroi Iroha, as the act of communication is via actions and touch, and the information is being transferred when the audience sends a message to the image recognition sensor and it responds back by changing the visuals seen on screen.

Image taken from http://cdn.luxuo.com/2018/05/8.-Mayuko-Kanazawa-Utsuroi-Iroha-2014.-Image-courtesy-of-the-Artist.jpg

Based on Roy Ascott’s “Behavioural Art and the Cybernetic Vision”, he mentioned the concept of behavioural art – which draws its characteristics of flux, change, indeterminancy from the confluence of cybernetics and new interactive forms. Utsuroi Iroha is behavioural in nature, as they are responsive to the audience, not fixed, and will change from moment to moment. The audience is no longer passive, but is a protagonist who can help determine or shape the outcome of a work. Feedback is negotiated between the audience and the machine, and is integral to the relationship. In the situation of Utsuroi Iraha, this concept is carried out, where the audience help deteremine the outcome of the work by having their image being placed on the artwork. This varies as every audience do not do the same action or have the same outlook.


A huge reference of artists’ work we learnt in class with regards to Interactivity is Robert Rauschenberg’s Soundings. The end product of his artwork varies as there are always different vocal sounds being transmitted and it affects the lights activated. It was through his interactive media work where the audience starts to take on a more interactive role rather than being a passive recipient.

Image taken from https://contemporarysquirrel.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/pr_soundings.jpg
Image taken from https://i0.wp.com/www.mychirpylife.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/20180530_1532399063958022832604305.jpg?ssl=1

Soundings is similar to Utsuroi Iroha in a manner that audience plays an interactive role in the interactive media work, and the work varies according to the audience. However, a difference is that Soundings is better shown when a group of audience is present, but if a single person is there, it works fine too. But, Utsuroi Iroha does not have the capacity for a large group, and the maximum audience per seasonal timepiece is 4. Any more than that, the image recognition sensor will be unable to detect. Furthermore, Soundings enables audience to be positioned anywhere near the work, but Utsuroi Iroha needs the audience to be positioned at a marked spot for the convenience of the image recognition sensor. Therefore, both artworks are similar in concept of interactivity but when it comes to execution, there are differences.

Animated GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Similar artworks many Singaporeans are familiar with are works from TeamLab. Also from Japan, they are famous for interactive art with the usage of technology, and are exhibited on many museums and festivals within Singapore. A recent work that I visited from TeamLab is an exhibit they have at National Museum of Singapore, whereby sensors are being placed to sense audience’s movements and the work reacting to it in a unique manner.

(jump to 1:19 to see the Utsuroi Iroha exhibition at SAM),
credits to Amee on Youtube, https://youtu.be/gfzkokWcrRk


Utsuroi Iroha relied a lot on software technology where she played with motion graphics and having hardware (imagery sensors) be placed to detect images and concurrently, placing it in her artwork. There is a huge combination of art and technology used, and without technology, the work will not be able to work successfully and just turn out passive.


Kanazawa Mayuko’s Utsuroi Iroha did not demonstrate much collaboration as most of her work deals with technology, and is not performance art, but interactive art. The closest collaboration she has is with engineers and technicians on the technological aspect. However, there is collaboration within her targeted audience, as if there is no human interaction, the artwork is pretty empty, as the main focus only appears when human interaction is present.

Image taken from http://kidslah.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/IMG_4529-1024×579.jpg

In conclusion, Kanazawa Mayuko’s Utsuroi Iroha is a successful interactive media art with a strong concept of interactivity. It is a good combination of art and technology and with the evolution of new media, interactive artwork will create an even longer history as more artists are coming up with ideas to combine art and technology.


Roy Ascott, “Behaviourist Art and the Cybernetic Vision”, Randall Packer and Ken Jordan (ed): Multimedia. From Wagner to Virtual Reality New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company 2002.

Norbert Wiener, “Cybernetics in History,” 1954, Multimedia: From Wagner to Virtual Reality

金澤麻由子 KANAZAWA MAYUKO » Blog Archive » PROFILE-English- -. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.mayuart.com/contents/2005/05/profile-english/

Utsuroi Iroha – Mayuko Kanazawa – Google Arts & Culture. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/utsuroi-iroha/9QHng68GJ6VoUg

Mayuko Kanazawa | Utsuroi Iroha (2014). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.artsy.net/artwork/mayuko-kanazawa-utsuroi-iroha

Imaginarium 2018 – Into The Space of Time: Explorations In Contemporary Art At Singapore Art Museum

HOD | artist’s key work selection

Based on my artist – Mayuko Kanazawa, I chose an artwork which was recently exhibited in Singapore Art Museum – Imaginarium 2018.

The artwork is Utsuroi Iroha, which invites their audience to participate by being part of the artwork of seasons and time.

The installation is a walkthrough, where there are different screens being shown in the enclosed area. It’s interactive in the manner that the audience stands at a mark spot and does a certain action. From that action, the visual display changes, alongside incorporating yourself inside the display. This installation brings to life the different seasons of Japan. Image recognition sensors weave the audience into the artwork, and by jumping or waving your arms, your character will morph into animals and even summon epic floral displays.

From this installation, we get to experience Japan and know more about it and it’s seasons, as in Singapore, it’s summer all year round and we do know having blooming flower seasons or cold weather like theirs. Furthermore, the installation is kind of personalised to each individual, as we all do a different action, triggering a different output of the work.

Through our interaction with the work, the artists hopes to highlight how our real-life actions impact nature and the environment.

Based on what was taught in class, this installation links to cybernetics, whereby there are specific acts of communication and transfer of information between the observer and the machine. Art is also behavioural in this instance, as from human interaction, it gives feedback to the machine and the artwork changes according to the feedback.

Till then,

HOD | artist selection: mayuko kanazawa

Image taken from http://www.mayuart.com/contents/wp-content/uploads/2005/05/_dsc67751-580×386.jpg


For my Hyperessay, I decided to go with an artist whom I’ve seen works before, and I chose Kanazawa Mayuko.
One of her more recent works were exhibited at Singapore Arts Museum’s Imaginarium 2018 – Into the space of time.

She specialises in Hand-drawing painting using Picture books, Animation and Experimental Art advanced technology.

I chose her work as I wanted to work on an artist or artwork that has a connection with Singapore. Personally, I’ve been to the exhibit and thought that it was really interesting.

Despite being an artist that does illustrations and animation, she does not limit herself to doing works that’s more 2D. She branched out to incorporating technology into these, allowing interaction between the participant and the work.

Therefore, I felt that she will be an appropriate artist to talk about breaking the norm of traditional art.

Till then,