Micro-Project 6: A Day in the Life of Super-Participation

A Day in the Life of Super-Participation

Members:  Hazel, Joey, JJ, Qistina

 

Personally, in my opinion, I feel that when I’m doing this microproject, I was very reluctant to disclose too much as I felt this project is a little to privacy invading. So most of the things that I post I tend to filter it, in terms of choosing what to post and what not to. So most of my post doesn’t show my face at all, but rather I show the things that I do or picture taken of others. I felt that the only personal things that I shared were my thoughts and how felt that day.

For my team, the things that we share are mainly how we go on about our daily life. Such as the food we eat, traveling or doing certain activities at certain places.

 

 

I believe that this project is not just about expressing our digital identity but at the same time a source of companionship. For my team’s post, some of the posts are a little emotional. For example, when I posted a photo of my grandma, it reminded JJ about his late grandma too, and this evokes a certain connection between people through the digital platform. Likewise, that day at night I posted my thoughts/feelings and Qistina comforted me, and this sort of allows people to feel that you are not alone through such a medium.

Digital media has become an extension of our digital image because what we post without much consideration actually reveal a lot about us even though we might think that they may be something trivial and not as revealing. However, human nature just functions in a manner that we process even the smallest information about you and form really quick judgment.

I felt that some people try to create persona/image of ourselves. However, I felt that at the same time, people tend to form an image of us as well via social media.

I felt that to a certain extent there are similarities between forming our self-image in social media and in reality because at both states we are able to be in control of what we want to show and what we choose not to, its just that social media has a wider freedom in terms of filtering.

Research Critique 3 – Glitch & The Art of Destruction

Glitch & The Art of Destruction

Members: Hazel, Tanya, JJ, Yeolmae

 

Synopsis

Our micro project 5 is about destroying physical Styrofoam with different tools. Trying to aim for the idea of while in the process of joining object together there is destruction and failure occurring during the process. For example, the usage of glue is to keep things together, but when applied to foam it deteriorates it. However, the idea was not successful, hence we carried on with the idea of just purely destruction.

 

1) This project has embraced the imperfection through destruction. Through the destruction of the medium, we allow freedom of errors and unexpected outcome without determining what should our outcome looks like.

For example, at first, our team was planning to use tools such as nails, glue, heat gun, fire to express the idea that tools as such may seem like it is connecting/joining the Styrofoam together however at the same time it destructs our object by leaving it scarred. However, this idea did not work out as planned, as we could not find the necessary tools that we have planned to use. Therefore, we embraced the process of encountering problems and decided to make do with what we can find and continue carrying out our destruction process. We replaced the planned items/process with super glue deterioration, scratching with a plier, breaking with hand and compressing with the clamp instead.

Through the filming process, it is inevitable for having sound or unstable hand camera movement. Hence, embracing inconsistencies, we incorporate such sounds and video movement into our project.

Initially, we thought that the use of UHU/super glue on foam would deteriorate it rather fast and the result would be obvious. However, it did not work out and by embracing such accident we just tried to further destruct it by filming it in a time-lapse and chaotic manner.

“The negative definition also has a positive consequence: it helps by (re)defining its opposite.”

 

2) Originally, it was a rectangular typical block of Styrofoam that we all recognize, through the process of destruction and deterioration it has become something that is irregular, out of shape and full of traces of “scar” that reflects the process it has gone through. In addition with the further inconsistency of filming and added on video editing effects, it became unrecognizable from the video. Instead of bringing it to the most basic and raw form we bring it to its limit. Testing the limit of how far can the foam endure destruction.

3) It is an artistic expression because we allow people to see objects either in its truest raw form or the limits of its qualities. At the same time through such expressions, we embrace and explored flaws. Nothing is perfect and things eventually deteriorate through the passage of time. Even if time and destructions cause imperfections that stays–like scars (perhaps a human form of glitch/destruction), it is important to recognize their existence, acknowledge them and accept them. Be it non-living items, technologies or human social behavior they are the same existing in all context and it is important for people to realize it. Through no restrictions and rules for perfection, the freedom of expression is able to create unexpected outcomes that enable us to learn about things around us in a deeper level instead of staying superficial with our limited perception. Looking at things from a different perspective could open up many more possibilities.

“They’re imperfect, they are not clean, because they exist in the world, which is also imperfect. And so, I do believe that dirty new media as a way of life and as an approach to art making is a way of foregrounding these facts, these realities, of our lived experiences.”