Master Zhao mentioned this one work by Tan Pin Pin where she visits sites in Singapore where people have died/have been killed. It sounded along the lines of what I was trying to achieve, so I went to look it up online:
The Impossibility of Knowing
Can a video camera can capture the aura of a space that has experienced trauma? I made a list of places I knew about where accidents had happened and we filmed them. But my camera did not “capture” anything. It could be due to the limitations of physics, but the canal remained a canal, the house, a house. Maybe the aura we sought doesn’t exist. Maybe you can see better than us.
– Tan Pin Pin, 2010
The film comprises of still shot after still shot of “traumatic” locations, accompanied by the natural sounds occurring in those spaces, with the deep, slow narration of the traumatic stories that accompany these spaces.
I agree with Tan that the camera is not able to much beyond the objective representation of the space. The “aura” that seeks to be imbued was only possible through the narration of the story associated with these places. The experience of said “aura” then comes through through the viewer’s own imaginations, a sort of “fill in the blanks”, a trying to picture what is not pictured.
Now, what am I to do with my contaminated spaces?
Evidently it doesn’t really work to just document these spaces. Something has to be done to it. Visually through altering the space/visually through providing accompanying texts/auditorily through narration.
But how do you elegantly depict what is invisible i.e. how does one depict aura?
How appropriate it is that Robert brought us to see this one show “WHAT IS NOT VISIBLE IS NOT INVISIBLE”.
I think of all that was there I really enjoyed this one the most. So poetically captures and imbues physicality to air. I think it was really smart of them to open the show with this first work. 10/10 (Y)
But how does one imbue physicality to “aura” and memory? Crei.