Model #1
Front view Side view
Back view Top view
Front view
The SO had the same thickness as the SD and the height was too tall. Hence, I cut down on the height such that it is 1/3 of the breadth of the SD annotated with a X and made the SO extremely thin.
Side view
The SD is too long and is too similar to the height of D. Hence, I shorten the SD and lengthen D such that SD is 1/3 of D as annotated with L.
Model #2
Front View Side view
Top View
Front view
The length of SD is too long as compared to the breadth of D, hence I shorten SD and made D wider in order to achieve a 2:3 ratio for SD’s length and D’s breadth. In addition, I wanted to make changes to the model and wedge the SO to the SD as indicated in the diagram.
Side view
SO is too long and thick as compared to SD, hence I removed a huge area of the SO. I tried to make SO as thin as possible so that it is 1/3 to the breadth of SD annotated as A. The breadth of D is similar to A as well, thus I decided to extend it. As for additional changes, I wanted to pierce SO through D which is why there was an extension to the left of D
Model #3
Front view Back view
Side view Top view
Front view
SD too short as compared to D and SO is too long. After the SD extends down more, the SO will shift down such that the placement is 1/3 of the SD. In addition, the SO will be adjusted such that it will pierce through the SD
Top view
SD was shortened as its length is the same as the width of D, hence it was reduced such that SD’s length is 2/3 of the width of D indicated as x.
Overall I prefer Model #3 as compared to the other 2 as it will be much easier to work on *cough cough* and it gives a more interesting figure. I will be working more on this as the final model for submission.