reflection

This project was really interesting for me because art curation is not something that I am familiar with. I usually take it for granted when I visit a gallery or museum. I gained newfound respect and appreciation for curation through my experience with exhibit-making, no matter how small scale with the four objects that we needed to curate.

Wallpaper Rococo
One of the wallpaper backgrounds I wanted to use, though we vetoed it in order for everything to look consistent. From Nafees Group.
IMG-20151116-WA0001
Printing by Evon

Our final product! Happy with how it turned out.
Our final product! Happy with how it turned out.

Making the project itself was actually quite difficult for me because my group had many ideas that we had a hard time reconciling, but in the end, we were able to make it work and I’m really glad that we were able to pull it off. I would to thank my groupmates for the outcome! I have no experience with binding or working with wood either, and I have no idea where to print collaterals here in Singapore. I felt really lost on how to actually make the object but thankfully my groupmates told me not to worry too much about it.

Through writing the wall text and my own catalog entry, I was able to exercise my research and analysis skills. Above all that, I learned how to appreciate artifacts and art pieces from the colonial period, which I honestly did not think I would ever really be interested in. Before this class, I was only ever interested in Western postimpressionist paintings and art that came after that, so I’m glad I got this opportunity to think about time before that. It helped me contextualize a lot of the information in my head about colonialism.

I’ve had a lot of experience with colonialism in a way that in the Philippines, our Filipino and World History classes tend to focus on our colonial mentality and racial inequality. But this class and my stay in Singapore, in general, has given me a new perspective in this. It gave me historical background and I was able to produce more connections of why certain things turned out the way they did. As with our final project as well, I realized how much impact every single country has on another and how the countries’ interactions in the past play in the present.

I’m really glad for the opportunity to take this class and I really enjoyed it! Thank you Sujatha and classmates! I learned a lot from everyone and I’m glad I’ll get to take this experience home.

team 9: final gameplan

Pop-up book catalogue for our exhibit

Cover and backcover: made of plywood > reference to the many woods that appear in our furniture
– Cover will have a part with water inside it where you can make ships move around continents

General layout
COVER
Introduction
Spread 1: Ivory sidechair popup
Spread 2: Ivory sidechair catalogue entry
Spread 3: Ivory box popup
Spread 4: Ivory box catalogue entry
Spread 5: Folding screen popup
Spread 6: Folding screen catalogue entry
Spread 7: Chest of drawers popup
Spread 8: Chest of drawers catalogue entry
BACKCOVER
* Each popup page will have a wallpaper background, referring to the European home
* Catalogue entries will also have textbook images as references(?)

Tasks:
May ee – cover and back cover
Ross – layout
Evon and Teck Kim – printing, binding, pop-up

team 9: presentation and wall text

Where is Home: Colonial European Furniture with Asian Influences

Here is a link to our presentation. We would definitely appreciate your feedback!

We also edited our wall text to accommodate the comments.


 

The 17th and 18th Centuries were the peak of colonialist Europe. By this time, England, Netherlands, and France had caught up with Portugal and Spain in establishing ports and, eventually, colonies in Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Americas. While they did not colonize China and Japan, they were also popular countries to trade with and were able to establish ports there. In honor of the monarchs who ruled over the European states, explorers and later, traders, would bring back crafted items made of precious materials to their kings and queens. They were a mix of sculptures already crafted by Asian natives and objects commissioned by the Europeans to be used by royalty. These were items with European functions and forms, like saltcellars and pipes.

They were also made with precious materials found in Asia. In this exhibit, there are various items made of ivory, ebony, and lacquer. Ivory is found in India and Southeast Asia, only acquired through the tusks of elephants. Ebony, in contrast, is a dark, heavy wood found in Africa, whose people traded with India and Persia long before the Europeans came. Because it was so sturdy, it was an excellent material for furniture. Lacquer is a resin originating in China, eventually making its way to Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. It is used to paint and creates a metallic effect, usually used to show gold.

Eventually, even larger items like cabinets and chairs made of these materials were transported to showcase the craftsmanship of these colonies. Also, since these were easier to transport and more ships were coming back and forth from Europe to Asia, more people were able to gain access to these materials. Collecting items from colonies was no longer just a royal hobby: if one was rich enough, these items could easily be bought from various merchants.

At this time, furniture represented an individual’s social status and contributed to a significant part of their assets. It was popular to keep a well-acquainted living room, especially with the variety of tables and textiles one could use for decoration. Having furniture from Asia was trendy at that time, especially as it was a show of wealth and worldliness. The aesthetic of these Asian materials was so popular that even European furniture makers were influenced to combine the designs of different cultures.

Our exhibit tells the story of Europeans becoming acquainted with Asian furniture, as exemplified by our Indo-Portuguese ivory box and side chair. Asian influence continued to flourish in Europe, the colonizers bringing the materials home and creating something of their own with the influence they experienced through their exposure to different cultures and aesthetics. This is shown by our Mexican folding screen, typically a Chinese furniture, and French chest of drawers, which is a fusion of European, Asian, and even African influences.

Despite Europeans being the ones who colonized Asia, Asian influence was able to colonize the homes of the Europeans. The colonizer has in turn been colonized.

team 9: meeting + edited object label

  • Title: “Where is Home: Colonial European Furniture made with Asian Influences” > We thought very hard about wording! haha
  • May ee will print a furniture prototype over the weekend to check how to make the pop-up work
  • Try: book binding > sewing and glue, or punch hole
  • Making Powerpoint in Google slides
  • We edited the wall text:

    The 17th and 18th Centuries were the peak of colonialist Europe. By this time, England, Netherlands, and France had caught up with Portugal and Spain in establishing ports and, eventually, colonies in Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Americas. While they did not colonize China and Japan, they were also popular countries to trade with.
    In honor of the monarchs who ruled over the European states, explorers and later, traders, would bring back crafted items made of precious materials to their kings and queens. They were a mix of sculptures already crafted by Asian natives and objects commissioned by the Europeans to be used by royalty. These were items with European functions and forms, like saltcellars and pipes.

    They were also made with precious materials found in Asia. In this exhibit, there are various items made of ivory, ebony, and lacquer. Ivory is found in India and Southeast Asia, only acquired through the tusks of elephants. Ebony, in contrast, is a dark, heavy wood found in Africa, whose people traded with India and Persia long before the Europeans came. Because it was so sturdy, it was an excellent material for furniture. Lacquer is a resin originating in China, eventually making its way to Japan, Korea, and Vietnam. It is used to paint and creates a metallic effect, usually used to show gold.

    Eventually, even larger items like cabinets and chairs made of these materials were transported to showcase the craftsmanship of these colonies. Also, since these were easier to transport and more ships were coming back and forth from Europe to Asia, more people were able to gain access to these materials. Collecting items from colonies was no longer just a royal hobby: if one was rich enough, these items could easily be bought from various merchants.

    At this time, furniture represented an individual’s social status and contributed to a significant part of their assets. It was popular to keep a well-acquainted living room, especially with the variety of tables and textiles one could use for decoration. Having furniture from Asia was trendy at that time, especially as it was a show of wealth and worldliness. The aesthetic of these Asian materials was so popular that even European furniture makers were influenced to combine the designs of different cultures.

    Despite Europeans being the ones who colonized Asia, Asian influence was able to colonize the homes of the Europeans. The colonizer has in turn been colonized.

  • I also edited my object label:
    Chest of drawers
    1745
    Bernard Van Risenburg
    France
    Chinese Coromandel lacquer on oak and Indian ebony veneer
    All the materials used to make this chest of drawers were from various European colonies in the East. The oak and ebony used to construct the frame of the drawers were imported from the Dutch East India Company. On the other hand, the panels, painted in red and gold lacquer, were from China. These all eventually ended up in France, which acquired these materials not from their own ports, but instead also engaged in trade with other Europeans which had settlements in India and China. The French furniture designer Bernand Van Risenburg, inspired by the various materials, used them to create this ornate chest. This time was also when Rococo was popular in France. Rococo is a style which makes use of heavy floral ornamentation and light and airy decoration, and Chinese Art matched perfectly with this kind of style.

(team 9) object labels and wall text

Object labels

  1. India, Coromandel Coast, Side Chair, 17th Century, Ebony, remains of Ivory
    Side Chair
    17th Century
    India, Coromandel Coast, Ebony, remains of Ivory

chair

The Side Chair, produced in the 17th Century, appeared to be made for the European powers who fought over the control of Indian Trade during that period of time. For whom the side chair was made for was not known, but in 1662, Catherine of Braganza brought luxury goods made in India to London and it was said that the chair could be one of Catherine of Braganza’s possessions. Ebony was admired for its dark colour and its hardness. It was seen as an exotic wood that was too rare and precious to be used as a solid wood for the making of furniture. The furniture makers thus incorporated other techniques and materials while making ebony furniture such that ebony wood could be reserved for veneering only.

  1. Box, Teak, ebony & ivory, Mughal India, 16th/17th Century, Indo-Portuguese Style Furniture

Screen Shot 2015-10-13 at 12.09.26 PM

Extremely rare Mughal Indo-Portugese Box in teak overlaid with ebony and inlaid with natural, brown and green stained ivory, depicting Portuguese figures in 16th century costume engaged in hunting scenes on foot, on horseback and riding an elephant. This box belongs to a group of ivory inlaid furniture, possibly from the same workshop, the most notable examples being a cabinet on cabinet in the Museu de Arte Antiga in Lisbon, a “communion” table top in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London as well as two table cabinets depicting hunting scenes and Portuguese figures in the Kuwait National Museum and in the Cincinnati Art Museum.

All these pieces show a great consistency of decorative principles and details, with a dense tree and flower decoration covering the whole surface of the panels. The trees are undulating and the composition seems to flow in an idyllic and naturalistic Persian inspired scenario of great delicacy and precision. This type of work is clearly distinguishable from the more common and probably later “tree of life” type.

3. Cock Fight Folding Screen, New Spain, 17th Century

Object label
Cock Fight Folding Screen
17th Century
Mexico
Lacquered wood with gold decoration and paint  

23-28f82ad06e

The Folding Screen (Biombo), with its Chinese-style (Achinado) aesthetics were highly sought after by the officials, settlers of New Spain, emerging from the conquest and colonization of the continent. They were able to consolidate their positions with such status symbol objects. These accessible biombos in New Spain imitated the European style of wall hangings and assumed their narrative element.  Forming part of a New Spanish material culture with its highly valued Asian origin, artisans made a conscious and selective appropriation of its Asian elements to give it a new meaning. This folding screen illustrates a representation of Mexico City in an Oriental environment, framed by a mix of Asiatic and New Spanish architectural elements.

  1. Chest of drawers by Bernard Van Risenburg (1745). Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art, New York. Made of Chinese Coromandel lacquer on oak and Indian ebony veneer.
    Screen Shot 2015-10-03 at 6.02.04 PM
    By this time in the 18th century, different European states were already actively trading using the ports in their colonies all over Asia. While this chest of drawers was made in France, all the materials used to make it were from various European colonies in the West. The oak and ebony used to construct the frame of the drawers were imported from the Dutch East India Company. On the other hand, the panels, painted in red and gold lacquer, were from China.

Wall text

The 17th and 18th Centuries were the peak of colonialist Europe. By this time, England, Netherlands, and France had caught up with the Portugal and Spain in establishing ports and, eventually, colonies in various areas in Asia. They were no longer confined to India and Southeast Asia, but also were able to trade with Japan and China, countries which were relatively harder to get to.

In honor of the monarchs who ruled over these respective lands, European traders would bring back crafted items made of precious materials to their kings and queens. They were a mix of sculptures already crafted by Asian natives and objects commissioned by the Europeans to be used by royalty. These were items with European functions and forms, like saltcellars and pipes. Eventually, even larger items like cabinets and chairs were transported to showcase the craftmanship of these colonies. Also, since these were easier to transport and more ships were coming back and forth from Europe to Asia, more people were able to gain access to these materials. Collecting items from colonies was no longer just a royal hobby; if one was rich enough, these items could easily be bought from various merchants.

At this time, furniture represented an individual’s social status and contributed to a significant part of their assets. It was popular to keep a well-acquainted living room, especially with the variety of tables and textiles one could use for decoration. Having furniture from Asia was trendy at that time, especially as it was a show of wealth and worldliness. The aesthetic of these Asian materials was so popular that even European furniture makers were influenced to combine the designs of different cultures, not being able to choose simply one.

(8) textile from sumba

I used to not be so impressed with exhibits dealing with artifacts, but after weeks of attending this class, I definitely gained an appreciation of religious sculptures, textiles, furniture, and other such items. When I entered Asian Civilizations Museum, I was surprised to find myself really enjoying seeing so many legitimate artifacts! There’s no museum this diverse back in my home country, so I really enjoyed it.

I especially liked the textiles, which again, surprised me, because I’m not usually so interested in these. It was really interesting to see how they dyed and wove fabrics in the 17th-20th centuries. The first thing to interest me, to be honest, was the aesthetic quality of these textiles. They were all easy on the eyes and very pretty, and in such nice colors too.

Warp ikat hinggi kombu man's mantle, mid-20th century. East Sumba. Asian Civilizations Museum, Singapore.
Warp ikat hinggi kombu man’s mantle, mid-20th century. East Sumba. Asian Civilizations Museum, Singapore.

It may be predictable, but my favorite piece was this textile from Sumba that our guide concentrated so much on. I really like the imagery, because they were obviously deer, horses, lobsters, roosters, and snakes, but they are really beautifully stylized. They’re really gorgeous illustrations. I also really like the colors that were used, as it’s well-contrasting and the play of reds and blues is really interesting to look at! The fact that it’s from somewhere I never really heard from—embarrassing, because I am, after all, still South East Asian—is also so amazing to me. As I never knew they existed, their history was really so interesting to me. I definitely want to read up on them some more.

The image above that I took of it doesn’t do it justice, in my opinion. All the textiles were really amazing. As I looked at them, I really thought that these are the kinds of fabrics I really want to find in flea market for my mom and grandmother to use as scarves! Of course, these deserve to be in museums rather than to be used as scarves, but I just want to get across that not only do they serve a historical purpose, they also are really pretty.

Because I’m only in Singapore until December, I’m quite sad that I won’t be able to see the other exhibits in ACM, at least in the current duration of my stay. I hope to see them when I come back one day!

(7) japonaiserie room

Spring in a Hot Spring by Yasuda Hiroshi, 1940.
Spring in a Hot Spring by Yasuda Hiroshi, 1940.

If I had to choose between the two, I would pick Japonaiserie, because I’m a big fan of the artists who were heavily influenced by Ukiyo-e. I would love to have Van Gogh, Gauguin and Klimt paintings all over my room! I think they have warmer colors and are also less delicate looking, so they would give a more homey feel. While Chinoiserie has very nice looking wallpapers, they’re a bit too delicate for me, and I wouldn’t necessarily feel at home. I think my standard especially for my own room is for me to be comfortable in it.

d4191224x
A group of French Japonaiserie bamboo, lacquer and rattan, late 19th century. Private European Collection, Christie’s.
Sideboard by Edward William Godwin, 1876. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.
Sideboard by Edward William Godwin, 1876. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.

Japonaiserie is more evident in paintings than in furniture, so when it comes to that, it’s a bit harder to say. I did find this French Japonaiserie bamboo furniture set, which I prefer compared to heavier-set Chinoiserie furniture. They’re also more organic and homey looking. I also found this Japanese sideboard which is also really angular and more modern looking than Chinese furniture in a sleek way. Chinoserie furniture are heavier-set with a lot of decorative lacquer so I wouldn’t be comfortable having such elegant things in my own room. Sleek, Japanese-inspired furniture is more zen and simple, which I like better.

In general, I actually prefer not to have antique furniture in my own household! I definitely like looking at antique furniture in museums, but I feel like that’s where they belong. I’m a bit too clumsy to handle old furniture, I think!

The image above is Irises by Van Gogh, 1889. J. Paul Getty Museum, California.

(team 9) individual project research

European Furniture in the 17th and 18th Century: Furniture made with Asian Materials with Other Asian Influences during the Colonial Period

Possible Objects
1. Chest of drawers by Bernard Van Risenburg (1745). Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art, New York. Made of Chinese Coromandel lacquer on oak and Indian ebony veneer.
Screen Shot 2015-10-03 at 6.02.04 PM

This is a really interesting piece because the relief painting made of Chinese lacquer was imported from China and the panels were made to fit the oak and ebony cabinet made from materials from Indian Ocean trade. This was considered fashionable and trendy, with its European form and Oriental details. The marble countertop gave it a luxurious finish. As this was made in the 1700s, Europe must have already grown accustomed to trade with Asia, as they’ve started to merge different concepts and ideas into one gorgeous piece of furniture. This piece in particular really shows the fusion of East Meets West.

2. Ebony carved settees (18th Century). Galerie Liova, Paris. Made of Idonesian ebony and woven cane.

Screen Shot 2015-10-03 at 7.22.52 PM

This was fully made in Indonesia, with elements from both Indonesian and Dutch furniture. The knobs on the sides of the settee are very Indonesian, while the poppy details and composition of the arms and legs were popular features of Dutch furniture in that time.

Possible Formats
I am really interested in the pop-up book format May ee brought up in our meeting, and have been thinking of ways to execute that. Other than that idea, I think a physical model of the room is the most apt. The four sides of the exhibit room would represent a country each, ex. France, England, Netherlands, Spain, and so the wallpaper of each wall would show a different motif to say which country is which. Then our objects would be the focal points of each wall, then there will be other pieces of furniture around them to supply context. This would let the viewer go around the room and get the feel of colonial Europe as a whole and how each country was able to be influenced by their own colonizers.

Goals
I want to be able to explore the relationship between colonial era Europe and Asia, and European countries with each other through their furniture. I also want to learn how curation works, especially for artifacts, which I never really learned about.

References:
Goodman, Dena & Norberg, K, ed. Furnishing the Eighteenth Century: What Furniture can tell us about the European and American Past. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2007. Print.
Galerie Llova. “A Very Rare Pair of Ebony Carved Settees.” Paris: Galeria Llova, 2012. Web.

(6) family

For me, a family portrait is simply a picture taken of a group of people that consider themselves family, more in the household sense than anything else. It’s hard to define specifically because family is such a hard word to define, especially in contemporary times when this definition is changing to accommodate single parents, gay couples, remarriages, adoption, and all these other technicalities. I do think all of these are valid, and it’s up to the person in that family who they consider family. I would define family as the people who will always be behind you and support you. Some people would regard their friends as more of a family than their bloodline is, and I also think that is valid especially if you don’t feel the support you need from your family. I do think, though, the people one grows up with. especially under the same household, are a blessing and are important in the growth of a person. For me, any picture of this kind of relationship between persons is a family portrait.

I have placed three family portraits below which span from 50 to 100 years apart from each other to discuss the differences and similarities of each century.

Family of Queen Victoria by Franz Xaver Winterhalter, 1846. East Gallery, Buckingham Palace.

This first picture is a portrait of the royal family of Queen Victoria. She’s clearly the center of attention, as her husband is looking at her instead of at the viewer, which she herself is doing. The room they are having their picture in is adorned with heavy golden furniture and lots of royal reds. The queen and her daughters are wearing ornate white gowns to show their delicacy but also their purity.

Le Dejeuner sur l’herbe de la Famille Soler by Pablo Picasso, 1903. Musée des Beaux-Arts de Liège, Belgium.

This next painting, painted around fifty years later by Pablo Picasso, shows a more relaxed image of a regular family. As this is during the modern art movements, more people can afford family portraits and therefore more casual images of a normal family are found. The photo is a humble portrayal of a loving family, even including their family pet. The attitude of their children can even be analyzed through their clothing and facial expressions.

The Jolie-Pitt family, 2011. Fame Pictures, Inc, Santa Monica.

This last picture is a picture of the Jolie-Pitt family, a famous Hollywood family. What’s so interesting about the Jolie-Pitt family are their numerous adopted children from all over the world, made obvious by their skin color, but also interspersed with their own offspring. Despite the obvious difference in blood relations in all of them, they still consider themselves a family. This is exactly what I meant by my definition of a family earlier: in contemporary times, the ones you grow with and support you. For example, despite Maddox, their Cambodian son, obviously being of different descent, they still stay under the same roof and take care of him. Another example is how Shiloh, their daughter, prefers to be called a boy, and they do treat Shiloh that way, supporting her through anything she goes through.

Personally, just taking any photo, especially during special occasions, is a good enough family photo. It’s so easy to take a family portrait nowadays, what with tripod cameras, phone cameras, even front cameras being so easily accessible to us. Since absolutely anyone can take a picture with their family, I think what’s more important is cherishing your family, because more often than not, they will be the ones who will be there for you all throughout. I do like family photos with more personality, though, so I really enjoy happy, smiley ones! Thankfully, quick cameras can take spontaneous, candid pictures like this now, which I think capture the spirit of family the best.

Modern Family cast, 20th century Fox Television.
Modern Family cast, 20th century Fox Television.

(5) the loophole of retreat

We were able to study many depictions of slavery in portraiture back in the 15th-17th centuries in the past weeks. The artists of these portraits showed slaves fading into the black background in the corners of these paintings, their presence only enhancing the power that their white masters (shown as the central figures of these paintings) emanated or at least, wanted to emanate. Back then, artists included these servants to make the viewer relate the patron of these paintings as regal. Seeing them now though, it makes us think about the power relations due to race, superiority and inferiority complexes due to skin colors, and the unavoidable racist comments in contemporary media.

While artists before never meant to show slaves as anything more as accessories, nowadays, contemporary artists depict both past and current slaves or laborers with sympathy, always attempting to draw attention to their poor life situations and raising awareness and appreciation for their work.

This is what Ellen Driscoll does through her instillation, The Loophole of Retreat (1991-92). She directly got the idea from the 21st chapter of the autobiographical book Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Harriet Jacobs. In this chapter, Jacobs narrates how she had to hide in an attic for several months due to her occupation as a slave and also in fear of violence due to her race. Driscoll recreates the feeling of confinement in her instillation using wooden boards to create a small space gallery visitors can enter.

The Loophole of Retreat by Ellen Driscoll
The Loophole of Retreat by Ellen Driscoll (1991-92) Wooden cone, 12 mixed media objects on motor, 7 columns with shadow pictures

There were cracks in the space’s walls so light would filter through and the objects on the mobiles outside the wooden cone would be visible from inside. According to Barbara Rodriguez, an art writer, this gave the piece a “fragmented” feeling, letting the viewer enter a nightmarish, claustrophobic, dream-like state. Driscoll draws out the sympathy of the viewers towards Harriet Jacobs, who had to hide in this kind of rooms for months.

This piece doesn’t only address slavery, but also speaks about the abuse and racism that comes with it, especially in the 18th and 19th centuries. Thankfully, we no longer have an analogy of dark skin is to slavery and light skin is to royalty, at least not to that extreme, but admittedly, we have a long way to go when it comes to stereotypes. Still, pieces like Driscoll’s help us honor the past and humanize history, which helps us appreciate not only the slaves of the past but also their equivalent in the present.

References: 
Phillips, Patricia. “The Proportions of Paradox.” Ellen Driscoll. 1 Nov. 2000. Web. 18 September 2015.
New York Historical Society. “Legacies: Contemporary Artists Reflect on Slavery No. 3 of 3.” Online video clip. Youtube. YouTube, 30 May 2006. Web. 18 September 2015.