Initial Ideas…
As we have seen my key interest in the area of Spirituality from my past projects, I do feel like keeping up with that topic for this assignment as well.
Spirituality on its own has many facets to it. Scholars and philosophers engage in endless studies on the complexity of spirituality and religion. Thus, I feel like there is so much more that I can explore by further delving into this topic that interests me the most.
The first word I chose to brainstorm 18 possible ideas was:
GOD
- God from the point of view of a Vedantist* is Krishna
- God from the point of view of the Guiltless is the Judge
- God from the point of view of Animals is a Vegetarian
- God from the point of view of a Robot is the Scientist
- God from the point of view of a Farmer is the Sun
- God from the point of view of a Fisherman is the Sea
- God from the point of view of a Child is his Mother
- God from the point of view of a Mother is an Innocent Child
- God from the point of view of a Christian is Christ
- God from the point of view of the Patient is the Doctor
- God from the point of view of an astronaut is the Universe
- God from the point of view of an Atheist is
- God from the point of view of a Gardener is the Earth
- God from the point of view of the Poor is Money
- God from the point of view of a Sculpture is the Sculptor
- God from the point of view of Painting is the Painter
- God from the point of view of a Scientist is the Big Bang
- God from the point of view of a Dog is his Master
* Vedantist are the original Hindus. I prefer not to use the term Hindu as that was a term coined by the Persians for those who practised the Vedic Religion of “Hinduism”.
The Vedic scriptures have a verse: “satyaṁ paraṁ dhīmahi”, which translates to the meaning: I meditate upon Him, for He is the Absolute Truth. Which brings me to further ideas.
TRUTH
- Truth from the point of view of a Devotee is God
- Truth from the point of view of a Yogi is Life after Death
- Truth from the point of view of the Guiltless is the Lady of Justice
- Truth from the point of view of an Employer is Salary
- Truth from the point of view of a Mother is the Word of her child
- Truth from the point of view of a Scholar is Education
DEATH
- Death from the point of view of a Prey is its Predator
- Death from the point of view of a Family is Grief
- Death from the point of view of a Spiritualist is A new birth
- Death from the point of view of a Poor man is poverty
- Death from the point of view of those starving is Hunger
- Death from the point of view of the ill is disease
- Death from the point of view of a Monk is a worldly suffering
- Death from the point of view of a Predator is food
- Death from the point of view of a soldier is pride
- Death from the point of view of an enemy is victory
HEAVEN
- Heaven from the point of view of a Drunkard is an Alcohol Bar
- Heaven from the point of view of a Lusty man is the Brothel
- Heaven from the point of view of a Gambler is the Casino
- Heaven from the point of view of a Meat Eater is the Slaughterhouse
- Heaven from the point of view of a Lazy man is the Bed
- Heaven from the point of view of a Sinner is Sins
Sex, can be seen in different perspectives. In the spiritual sense, sex is very much seen as a mystical and wonderful creation of God. It is able to bring about procreation. Indeed, the whole universe continues with life due to sexual union in all living entity.
SEX
- Sex from the point of view of Marriage is procreation
- Sex from the point of view of A pervert is rape
- Sex from the point of view of Kama Sutra is divine union
- Sex from the point of view of a Masochist is bondage
- Sex from the point of view of a Rape victim is trauma
- Sex from the point of view of Human is pleasure
Artist Reference
Giuseppe Arcimboldo
The main object of modern art critics interpretation are “curious” paintings of Arcimboldo. According to V. Krigeskort, these works are absolutely unique. Attempts of interpretation begin with judgment of a cultural background and philosophy of the artist, however a consensus in this respect is not developed. B. Geyger who for the first time raised these questions relied mainly on judgments of contemporaries — Lomazzo, Komanini and Moridzhia who used the terms scherzi, grilli and capricci (respectively, “jokes”, “whims”, “caprices”). Actually, Geyger’s monograph is entitled: “Comic pictures of Giuseppe Arcimboldo”. B. Geyger considered works of the artist as inversion, when the ugliness seems in beauty, or on the contrary as the disgrace exceeds the beauty, entertaining the regal customer. The similar point of view was stated by R. Barthes, but he reduced works of the artist to the theory of language, believing that fundamentals of art philosophy of Arcimboldo is linguistic, because without creating new signs, he confused them, mixed, combined, that is played a role of the innovator of language.
Arcimboldo speaks double language, at the same time obvious and obfuscatory; he creates “mumbling” and “gibberish”, but these inventions remain quite rational. Generally, the only whim (bizarrerie) which isn’t afforded by Arcimboldo — he doesn’t create language absolutely unclear … his art not madly.(Source: Wikipedia)