Are We Social?

Social broadcasting is the future of traditional medias such as the television and newspaper.

The broadcasting of video, text and pictures directly to an intended audience through social media channels such as Facebook, Youtube, Instagram and other channels as opposed to traditional channels such as radio, TV and print.

Above is the exact definition of social broadcasting. Most social media platforms are available worldwide which makes social broadcasting more extensive and public as compared to television or radio. When you post something online, everyone and anyone can see it. As the name suggests, it is social. Users get to share opinions and perspectives on whatever that is being shared online. Not only that, they also get to collaborate and DIWO (Do It With Others). This immensely improves the quality of a piece of work for instance as makers have access to immediate critiques through the net.

AW take 5

“Angry Women” is an example of a work that utilizes social broadcasting. In this piece, several women unite on a shared interface where they can see and hear the rest of the performers all at the same time as seen in the image above.

The women are tasked to express their anger according to a protocol or script until no anger is left as seen in the video above. Annie Abrahams wanted to explore how an expression such as anger in this case can disturb a group’s dynamic. She found that the project created a situation of “lonely togetherness, of life constructing a commonality, of being together and sharing this condition of co-responsibility, of scripted auto-organisation” (Annie Abrahams, Trapped to Reveal, 2011, Journal for Artistic Research).

The most interesting bit about this project to me is the fact that the women are mostly from different parts of the world with different time zones yet they are able to work together. I think that accentuates the wonder of social broadcasting. It enabled communication which then allowed for collaboration. We are able to view the performers live online which would have been impossible through traditional media. Social broadcasting strengthens networks more than ever.

FBI, here I am!


In this link, you will see random images of food and places as well as Google map with an arrow pointing to one location. Those pictures belong to Hasan M. Elahi, a Bangladeshi-born American who is a interdisciplinary media artist. Those images are a part of his still on-going project called “Tracking Transcience”. Why could he possibly want to show the whole world what he is doing and exactly where he is at?

Following the tragic 9/11 attacks, Elahi’s name was mistakenly added to the US government’s watch list in 2002. As such, an investigation was carried out by the FBI. After around 6 months, Elahi’s name was eventually cleared but the FBI was asked to still keep a watchful eye on him. Thus, Elahi gladly helped the team by executing the project. He allowed every member of the public, worldwide to follow his everyday life from what he eats, sees and wherever he is located as seen in the images below.

Image result for hasan elahi
The different hotel beds Elahi has slept on
The food Elahi has eaten
Image result for hasan elahi
Map of Elahi’s location

Elahi did this as a way to confront the FBIs and tell them that he really isn’t a terrorist threat in anyway. It’s a way of saying “you asked for it, here’s what you get”. He wanted to give the FBIs exactly what they want. Randall Packer mentioned in an interview with Elahi that “you are your own spy agency spying on yourself” which I thought was a good way to conceptualize this project. The FBIs need not spy on him to dig information on him as he presents everything they want to know on the website where he situates himself very openly.

Image result for snapchat map
Snapchat’s Snap Map

In the beginning, several people commented that Elahi putting himself out there so freely was dangerous. People could plant an attack on him anytime, knowing his whereabouts every minute. However, in the interview with Randall Packer, Elahi mentioned how barely a few years later, it became exactly what social media users are doing. Referring to Elahi’s GPS device that he puts in his pocket everyday to track his location, we can see a similarity in the location-sharing function called “Snap Map” on Snapchat today as seen in the picture above. Anybody can know of your whereabouts as they did for Elahi’s.

It is certainly not rare to see social media users of today posting photos of their meals and loots on the daily especially on Facebook and Instagram. The main difference between their photos and Elahi’s is that Elahi updates his life live while social media users mostly carefully curate what they want to post to keep up with the expectations that the public have of them. This brings me to my point on our digital identity. Unlike Elahi, people today present themselves on the Internet mirroring how they want people to view them. It is never their true selves.

“If we choose how we present ourselves,
and we choose who we present ourselves to, don’t we risk
just falling into a collective just-so-story about who we are and
what we ought to believe?” – D.E Wittkower

This quote above questions the authenticity of people online. Are we really who we are? To me, social media platforms serve as a barrier to protect our vulnerability and true selves. It shields our weaknesses as we put up our best front. This short film below explains the shield that these platforms are.

A question to ponder on: What turn would social media take if all its users were to update their lives in real-time as Elahi, online without the ability to pick and choose what they want to share?