Recent Posts

Co-Broadcasting Experience and Thoughts.

Ong Zi Feng

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 10:25:12 pm

@ Basics

This Co-Broadcasting thing is definitely new to all of us! the best part of the co-stream is that we can communicate to each other with very little lag between in comparison to the usual broadcast where there will be atleast 7 seconds with optimal connections. Co-Broadcasting could possibly be used in our final project as our idea for the final project Read more →

Categories: Process
Very impressive use of co-broadcasting, particularly the coordination between the two of you and the transfer of objects. Amazing!

Cross-streaming Facebook Invite Test

Val Lay

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 09:18:13 pm

@ ◢ ◤

So Facebook decided to up their game and created a ‘invite’ feature for ‘live’ videos, inviting countless ideas to the already many ideas we have for our final project.

This feature helped my partner and I communicate better – it became two-to many from the one-to many. Pretty interesting as we could now give Read more →

I am very impressed with the inventory of issues: errors, latencies, etc. Now the question is, how to make creative use of those inconsistencies.

Research Critique Hyperessay - Jennicam

Su Hwee Lim

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 05:52:37 pm

@ Hwee's

Jennifer Ringley started off Jennicam when she stumble upon the new technology webcam and wanted to try and challenge herself on the programming skills in 1996. Jennicam originally it was only for her family and friends and suddenly it when viral when one of the Australian news wrote an article about the website.

Her webcam would take a photo of her bed Read more →

Categories: Research
Excellent essay. You made me realize that in fact JenniCam was a project that Jennifer Ringley used to essentially find herself through connection with others. Perhaps since there was no social media in 1996, she literally had to invent a platform that allowed her to be in constant connection. It was like she created her own Facebook! This was an interesting comment you made:
This kept me thinking if technology really are the one that creates the barrier between us when this problem already happen way before when social media became popular. However I really like the aspect that through this platform someone felt better after he know that actually we are all the same as human.
This is what got me thinking about how we all adapt ourselves to the communications platforms of the day to be connected socially with others, whether it be letters, telegrams, radio, television, telephone, Internet, mobile devices, etc. We always depend on platforms to gain a strong sense of ourselves. Excellent essay, it really made me think!

Research Critique: Jennicam

Siewhua

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 04:28:18 pm

@ Siewhua 's

In 1996, Jennifer Ringley, a junior at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania stumbled upon a new piece of technology at her college bookstore – a webcam – and came up with this radical idea to broadcast how she lived her life for seven years which updates an image every 15 minutes on a website. She shared every uncensored detail of her life, in Read more →

Categories: Research
Excellent! You should be Jennifer Ringley's biographer... this is so detailed and thoughtful. I think the theme of your critique revolves around this thought that Jennifer made in one of your references:
"I am not here to be loved or hated, I am here simply to be me.”
I think it is fair to see that the presence of the camera gives one a sense of self, a sense of authenticity, which clearly she needed and was looking for in the broadcast. Without the camera she felt disconnected, lonely. With the camera, she felt needed and in the presence of others. Now the question is: how much do we all require this kind of connectedness to feel "authentically" ourselves? Perhaps not to the extent of JenniCam, but maybe we all have a bit of that need to be in front of the camera to feel real. That may very well be the crisis of our age, that with the ubiquitous presence of cameras and the network, that we have come to be more and more reliant on this form of connected to truly be ourselves, to be real. Is that a frightening reality?
I agree with you that Jennicam was a curious and innocent experiment that went wrong. In one of the interview, she mentioned that she did not mind being watched. This doesn't mean that others don't. Thats why many of the people whom she knew back then did not want to be in her house. They did not have the same mind set like her. I think that they wanted to keep some parts of themselves private. For me, I think that not many of us require the level of connectedness that lets us feel authentic. Maybe the persona we see on Jennicam isn't her? Maybe she is willing to let people see what she wants others to see although she claims that she was more authentic. This also raises one question: Does it even matter if she is authentic or not? People will just view Jennicam as a form of entertainment and not aspects of entertainment is authentic.

Co-broadcasting on Facebook

Nicholas Makoto

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 02:42:20 pm

@ Grandma Joe

Today, Bao and I did a Facebook, co-broadcast where we continued our exploration of juxtaposing the same object next to each other. The difference being, that unlike the first time where we were both present in school and generally in the same area, this time we were in completely different places, our homes.

I’d say it was a great success, I Read more →

Categories: Micro-Project | Research
Good work!

Co-broadcasting Experience

BAO

Wednesday, Oct 18, 2017 - 02:29:54 pm

@ BAO

https://www.facebook.com/100008174537236/videos/1994484554167343/

https://www.facebook.com/100008174537236/videos/1991995774416221/

After doing two live broadcasting using co-broadcasting function, I felt that it can be used for interactions amongst a pair. However, I think in a group of four, it is very hard to achieve a smooth communication amongst all four as the co-broadcasting  only allows two live broadcasters to interact. One idea that I can think of for the final project Read more →

Categories: Research
Lots of great ideas!

Research critique: Jennicam

ʍıu zɐʍ

Tuesday, Oct 17, 2017 - 08:28:13 pm

@ CHEESE

“I’m trying to prove the point that no matter what you look like, you’re still just as interesting as people on the TV or in the magazines.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AmIntaD5VE

During the interview with David Letterman, Jenny brought up something interesting: the fact that there is a whole lot of things to watch on television. The fact that users still tune in Read more →

Categories: Micro-Project
Very good observations. One of the reasons we study JenniCam is its "intentionality." She wanted, purposefully, to share her life online. Not because she wanted to be an exhibitionist, but because she was interested in the idea of a shared life with others, perhaps out loneliness and wanting to create a social context for her life. Your friend, however, who got caught in the act, did not do this intentionally, it was an accident, so that it how it was different from Jennifer Ringley. Ultimately, art and expression is all about intent, at least that is where it begins. Good piece, it raises a lot of ideas and discussion.

Co-broadcasting Experience

Joan

Tuesday, Oct 17, 2017 - 06:39:06 pm

@ Joan

https://www.facebook.com/littleangel.hannah/videos/10159394268150425/

The co-broadcasting experience was great, as the split screen function was easily accessible and the connection was also smoother, as compared to OBS.

It was convenient, as the main broadcaster could see both sides simultaneously, possibly allowing more room for coordination during broadcasts. The person invited into the broadcast could also hear the main broadcaster, allowing for smoother responses and interaction. Read more →

Categories: Process
Good test!

Research Critique - Jennicam

Joan

Tuesday, Oct 17, 2017 - 06:05:29 pm

@ Joan

In 1996, Jennifer Ringley was the first person to broadcast her life online. It started when she was in college, where anyone with internet access could watch her through her photos that were updated every three minutes. Months later, her experiment spiraled into a global sensation, attracting up to four million paid views per day.

She was her own reality TV, Read more →

Categories: Micro-Project
Excellent Joan, you nailed it! You covered all the key points and I was particularly impressed with this comment:
Jennicam, on the other hand, lived her life in front of the camera seven years, truly capturing the ‘real-ness’ of her ordinary life.
What is it about a static Webcam that evokes the real? And was it the "real-ness" of her performance that made it so interesting? In our digital lives, do we crave reality? The real? The authentic? These are important questions we must ask, which you raise so well. And then there is the issue of super-participatory over-sharing, which we are all so willingly ready to do. Where does that impulse come from? I think it is embedded somewhere in JenniCam. Excellent piece.

Reflections on the shared broadcasting

ʍıu zɐʍ

Tuesday, Oct 17, 2017 - 05:19:41 pm

@ CHEESE

https://www.facebook.com/anammustaein/videos/10214837511392719/

This session of the shared broadcasting worked out much better than in OSS, so I was able to do a little bit more. However, I noticed that in both this instance and in the first ever Facebook broadcast, I was unable to speak coherently without having the urge and compulsion to check if the broadcast was working, or if I Read more →

Categories: Micro-Project
Very interesting ideas, but you didn't post the co-broadcast.
Ok I've added it in.
Thanks!