Pandora’s Box: Rule of Thirds

The theme that I got was Rule of Thirds.

Rule of Thirds is aligning your subject along the guidelines that split the plane into 9 faces or its intersections. It is a useful composition technique in many forms of art such as in design, photography and film. It usually helps to create a point of interest in your compositions.

Since we were supposed to present our theme in our model, I decided to use rule of thirds for many aspects of the model. For instance, if I intended to wedge in a piece, I’d make sure that 2/3 of it is hanging off. Or maybe I’d align the centre lines where the intersections are.

Process & Development

Sketch Model 1 

 

As my theme is relatively simple, there is no reason to “break” the rules or criteria. So I made sure that the D, SD and SO are consistent throughout all views. I managed to do so in this particular sketch model as well.  The challenge that I faced when making this model was with the lengths of the pieces. Avoiding similar lengths was especially tough, and changes had to be made to the other blocks if the length of something changed. The dominant block didn’t have much variation in surface area when viewed from all angles either. What I like about this model however, is that the principle axis of all three volumes are facing different directions.

 

Sketch Model 2

 

In this sketch model I tried to break away from fixing both the SD and SO to the D, and instead tried to fix the SO to the SD. I placed the volumes following the 1/3 rule. It had variation and was more dynamic in comparison to the other models. However, the final composition was unappealing to look at in my opinion and I decided to ditch it.

 

Sketch Model 3

 

This model is similar to sketch model 1. However I didn’t like the flatness, since all the boxes were relatively flat. I suppose in a way, the choice of boxes reflect the 1/3 rule, in the sense that they are three different sizes of similar shapes. Still, I didn’t want my model to be this flat so I didn’t choose this.

Final Model

 

 

Rule of Thirds is a basic principle, so in order to add more interest to my model I tried to incorporate other themes. I challenged myself to include as many themes as possible.

The most obvious theme might be contrast, as I chose my materials carefully. I chose a transparent box for the D because I knew I wanted to attempt the idea of levitation, especially since the SD is a relatively big block. For the SD and SO, I used Balsa wood, which to me is a “soft” material when compared to the transparent plastic. The contrast in man-made and natural material is complementary. I painted the SO black, so that there is visual balance. Big volume paired with a light colour, and small volume paired with a darker colour. Just by painting the SO black, it looks heavier. And it counterbalances with the SD.

 I think that the transparent box, natural wood, and painted wood complements one another and is aesthetically pleasing. What is interesting is that the D, which is supposed to be the most dominant out of the three, doesn’t not fight for attention with the SD and SO at all.

The different views have variation while having consistent D, SD, SO, and the principle axis of each box faces in different directions.

Application

Besides the obvious – a building, the final model can inspire a modern digital clock design, or a horizontal juice dispenser, where one can pull the black tab to dispense juice.

Reflection

I was confused as to why we needed to have consistent D, SD and SO, but after doing this exercise, I realised that a lot of products that I use in my daily life make use of this principle. And that it is an essential principle of design, which can be applied to almost everything. Even things like character design in animation which I intend to pursue.

For future assignments I hope to have a “story” behind my projects. I felt slightly restricted by my “simple” theme this time round, and found it hard to add a story element to it.

 

3D: Pandora Process

The theme that I got for my box compositions was Rule of Thirds.

Rule of Thirds is generally aligning your subject along the guidelines or intersections. It is a useful composition technique in many forms of art such as in design, photography and film.

Since week 1, we were told to experiment with different compositions using boxes of three different sizes, while keeping our theme in mind. However I am not used to this and found it difficult to come up with effective compositions. After week 2’s lesson, I am more aware of what to look out for in my compositions. For instance:

  • All three boxes should be able to be seen on all views.
  • The dominant volume, subdominant and subordinate should stay constant throughout most if not all views.
  • Avoid flushing.
  • Try to avoid similar shapes, instead have a variety of sizes with varying height and width.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Legend:

Red box – Dominant (D)

Blue box – Subdominant (SD)

Green box – Subordinate (SO)

_____________________________________________________________________________

These are the compositions that I arrived at after week 1 class. I made minor improvements than those that I showed in class, However these compositions still  do not work and for learning purposes I thought I’d analyse and record why they don’t work.

Composition 1

Composition 1 – Overall
Front view – Centre line of the SD is off because of camera and perspective.
Front view.
Bottom view – Size of D and SD are too similar!
Back view – SD is hidden which is not good.
Top view – Shapes are too similar.
Side view – Again, sizes are too similar In this view.

For composition 1, I tried to centralise my SD and SO’s centre line on the intersecting points of D, following rule of thirds. Although it fulfils the rule, did it not work for various reasons which have been noted in the captions. The main problem was that the shape and size of the boxes were too similar, which made boring compositions.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Composition 2

*I found some inaccuracy in this picture. I think I adjusted the SD when I got home, which is why the placement is slightly different in the analysis photos.
Front / Back view – I tried aligning the centre line of the SD and SB along the rule of thirds line.
Front / Back  view – Works okay in this view, but then there’s problems in other views.
Top view – I seem to have forgotten to take a picture of the top view so there is a sketch of it. It’s not good because of the entirely overlapping elements.
Bottom view – The SD is missing!
Side view – The SO is missing!

For composition 2, the main problem was that I had missing boxes in various views which is something that is discouraged. Placement of SD and SB isn’t that great either. The SB is within the confines of one of the boundaries of rule of thirds.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Composition 3

Front view – Front view looks okay in general.
Back view – D, SD, SO remains the same.
Side view – D, SD, SO, remains the same but I noticed that the shapes were too similar. (i.e. long rectangles)
Top view – This view doesn’t work because the SO seems to be bigger than the SD! Plus again, the similar area size.
How I aligned my SD and SO.  Centre lines at the guidelines.

Composition 3 is meant to be an improved version  of composition 2 which I did  before week 2 class. There is sliiiiight improvement in the consistency of the D, SD, and SO shapes on all views (Top view didn’t work) but not satisfactory because only half the views work. No box is hidden in any view for this composition. However the shape of the D and SD in the side view is rather unappealing so I need to replace that box with something else.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Composition 4

I placed SD and SO in the third section. Here I forgot to avoid flush so I’d need to tweak the position of the SD.
Front view
Back view – D, SD, SO remains the same.
Bottom view – SD and SO are similar here.
Top view – D, SD and SO remains the same.
Right side view – D, SD, SO remains the same.
Left side view – SD and SO has switched.

Composition 4 follows the rule of thirds and has 4/6 views with consistent D, SD and SO! This one has potential. I think I can continue developing this model by slightly varying the placement of the SD and SO to include another theme and make it more interesting?

_____________________________________________________________________________

Composition 5

Front view – Following the rule of thirds, the SD is placed at the intersection line while the SO is placed in the one-third fraction. This one has a sub-theme counter balance too.
Front view
Back view – D, SD, and SO remain the same.
Left side view – D, SD and SO remain the same.
Right side view – SD and SO are slightly similar.
Top + Bottom view (same) – D, SD and SO remain the same. This view seems to be the least interesting of all views.

Composition 5 has 4/5 consistent D, SD and SO views! It also incorporates a bit of the theme counter balance. However through compiling these images, I noticed that it may be a bit unstable. I would need to adjust the SD’s position. In fact, I think by wedging both the SD and SO I think it could work. I will develop on this for the final sketch model. I think material wise, if the SD was a transparent box, it could be “lighter” and balance out the entire sketch model visually.

I am pleased with my progress so far, as I have been able to keep the D, SD and SO relatively consistent. There are no more missing volumes compared to previous weeks. I just need to refine my models and adjust the placements to make the models look more interesting. I think using foam boards helped me in making my sketch models as I can easily create a piece that I need compared to finding a pre-made box that matches my requirements.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Wedging – Using Composition 4 and 5

Composition 6

This is a improvement of Composition 4. I used foam blocks because I wanted try out wedging. I changed the SD to give the shape more variation. After lesson, I realised that this does not work because when we wedge long blocks, 1/3 of it has to be wedged into the base, or else it will produce a rotational force on the entire composition. The widths of the blocks turned out to be very similar too, something that I didn’t take note until it was pointed out. So I’d have to adjust those.

Composition 7

This is a improvement of Composition 5. I used wedging to attach the SD and SO to the D. I modified the SD’s shape from Composition 5 so that there is more variety in shape. However again, I realised the lengths and widths are pretty similar so I need to figure out the measurements to the boxes.

Both models have consistent D, SD and SO for at least 4/5 of the views, following Composition 4 and 5, so my final sketch models would have similar configurations to them, with adjusted lengths and widths.